Skip to the answer
Proxy Costsprice data updated 2026-09-27last comparison window ends 2026-10-27. The update date is when this price data was prepared, not when every price was checked. Every figure on this site carries its own checked date.

Term

Defined by what it does to a bill, with a real plan from the dataset where the term changes the price.

Unlimited bandwidth plans: what “unlimited” does and does not mean

An unlimited bandwidth plan removes the transferred-gigabyte meter. It does not promise unlimited speed, ports, threads, sessions, addresses, access time, or acceptable-use capacity. The provider has moved the commercial constraint somewhere else, so the useful comparison asks what replaces the GB meter and whether that replacement is published. Dataset snapshot, evidence retrieved 2026-07-25

The word must always be attached to a field. “Unlimited bandwidth” can be true while a plan is limited to one port, 500 threads, 100 Mbps, one day of access, or a fair-use threshold. It must not be read as unlimited useful work.

When throughput replaces gigabytes

ProxyScrape shows the replacement directly. proxyscrape-unlimited-residential-1d-100mbps costs $190 for one day at 100 Mbps. proxyscrape-unlimited-residential-1d-200mbps costs $296 for one day at 200 Mbps. Both rows remove the GB meter, but they sell different throughput ceilings. ProxyScrape API and product page, retrieved 2026-07-25T16:33:08.221Z

Neither row has an honest price per GB. Converting either one would require an assumed transfer rate and continuous utilization that the provider does not sell as part of the receipt. Compare checkout, access duration, and purchased speed instead. The unlimited residential plan comparison keeps those commercial limits beside each dated offer.

A thread limit is not an IP count

proxyrack-unlimited-residential-500-threads publishes 500 threads and unmetered transfer without publishing a purchased IP count. litport-mobile-us-shared-device-month publishes 100 threads and a $49.99 monthly checkout, also without an IP count. Those rows support a comparison of parallel-work ceilings, not a conversion into addresses. ProxyRack pricing · LitPort U.S. mobile pricing, retrieved 2026-07-25T16:03:55Z

HydraProxy moves the boundary again. hydraproxy-usa-mobile-standard-30d publishes one port, 30 days of access, a $59.95 checkout, and unlimited concurrent connections. Unlimited connections do not remove the single-port or time boundary. HydraProxy mobile pricing, retrieved 2026-07-25T17:34:30.296Z

“Unlimited” can conflict with a fair-use ceiling

iproyal-isp-30d publishes a starting rate of $2.70 per proxy for 30 days, but its sources disagree about bandwidth. IPRoyal’s FAQ calls Datacenter and ISP bandwidth unlimited under fair use, while its terms state that each proxy includes a 100 GB monthly allowance and usage is calculated per order. The dataset marks the row conflicting, leaves the minimum checkout unknown, and does not publish a charge after the allowance. It cannot support either an unrestricted-bandwidth claim or a computed overage bill. IPRoyal pricing, fair-use FAQ, and provider terms, retrieved 2026-07-25T16:33:08.221Z

That disagreement is part of the answer. “Unlimited under fair use” and “100 GB included per proxy” are not interchangeable. Until the provider publishes what happens after the allowance, both statements stay visible and the row stays out of any ranking that depends on unrestricted traffic.

Missing limits stay missing

The dated July 26 review behind the commercial unlimited-plan comparison checked 106 held plans. Ninety-seven published a usable substitute constraint and nine did not. The incomplete set included plans with an acknowledged but unnumbered concurrency limit, unquantified carrier fair use, a source path that could not be read under its robots policy, custom bandwidth, or no numerical capacity for the standard plan. None of those missing numbers means unrestricted.

The July 25 dataset contained 68 plans explicitly sold without a traffic limit. Forty-five did not publish a concurrency maximum and 23 explicitly described concurrency as unrestricted. Thread limits were numeric on 20 of those 68 rows, explicitly unrestricted on 14, and not published on 34. “Unlimited bandwidth” therefore does not answer how much parallel work a plan can perform. Dataset snapshot, evidence retrieved 2026-07-25

Five questions to ask before checkout

  1. Is transferred data unmetered, or does service continue with paid overage?
  2. What numerical throughput, thread, session, or port ceiling replaces the GB meter?
  3. What billing period or access duration ends the entitlement?
  4. Does fair use have a numerical threshold, measurement window, and published consequence?
  5. Does each limit apply per IP, port, device, plan, order, or account?

ProxyMesh shows why the first question matters. Its World Proxy add-on counts against a required parent plan’s 50 or 100 GB allowance and continues with paid overage. It is not an unlimited standalone checkout. ProxyMesh pricing documentation, retrieved 2026-07-25T17:42:41.156Z

The practical definition is narrow: unlimited describes the meter the provider removed. Compare the cap that remains. If you need a fixed traffic budget instead, use the matched pay-as-you-go versus monthly calculation. When the remaining cap is not published, the plan cannot be sized from public evidence regardless of how large the word looks on the pricing page.